The fact that three organizations who despise each other were able to agree that they needed to drop should be a wake up call to the IFC. The rules and formatting of pairings are ridiculous. Heard from a brother the no pledge rule is killing this event.
last synced with YikYak 6d ago
There is not a no pledge rule. It’s 50/50, and the three were even offered to do only pledges and still said no. Clearly shows organizations not wanting to connect with new sororities. Bad look on their part
On kapsig eboard, we were not offered any sort of leeway on the 50/50 rule.
you know the 50/50 rule was always a gray area and if you can’t make it it’s not the end of the world. there’s no way that’s the sole reason for dropping
Last sem our team didn’t hit full roster due to the 50/50 rule yet we still did it.
This is just completely false. The dropping was about lack of input and no signups, the “bouse sorority” ideas is projection
Genuine projection. If the sorority pairings were actually random there would be no problem. The fact that 2 people on the IFC choose and get to give themselves great pairings and everyone else bad is ridiculous. How do you think DZ gets Beta every year? Think about it.
Lack of input 💀 No it’s very clear it’s due to the sorority pairing
Yeah but yall never complained until you got screwed over. Everyone else didn’t drop out when they got these sororities or got screwed over themselves. Yall just got massive egos